Best AI Tools for Designers

Introduction

Choosing the wrong AI tools for designers can lead to substantial time loss, ineffective workflows, and increased cognitive load. For instance, an overhyped tool may promise seamless integration but becomes a maintenance burden, causing project delays and frustration. When these tools fail to scale with your needs, they can degrade collaboration and creativity, leading to missed deadlines.

This article helps experienced freelancers make informed decisions about AI tools by focusing on real-world fit and limitations. Rather than generic reviews, we analyze tools in the context of operational realities, highlighting failure points and trade-offs that can impact your design process.

Comparison Table

Tool	Best for	Setup friction	Cost level	Breaks when…	Main limitation
Adobe Firefly	Generative design tasks	Moderate	$$	Heavy image processing needs arise	Limited customization options
Canva Magic Write	Quick content generation	Low	$	Complex layouts or branding needs	Less effective for large projects
Figma Plugins	Collaborative design enhancements	Low	$$	When team members use different plugins	Over-reliance on third-party tools
Runway ML	Video and animation	High	$$$	Large file sizes overwhelm the platform	Requires strong internet connectivity
Designify	Image enhancement	Low	$	High-resolution output is needed	Quality degradation with complex images
Artbreeder	Aesthetic exploration	Moderate	$$	When specific quality or style is required	Limited output control

Tools

Adobe Firefly

Adobe Firefly excels in generative design tasks but can become a pain point as project complexity increases. While it integrates well with other Adobe tools, the initial setup can be cumbersome, requiring users to familiarize themselves with its unique interface and features. Over time, users may find the lack of customization options limits their creative expression.

As design needs evolve, the tool’s heavy image processing requirements can lead to performance issues, especially with large files. This can slow down workflows significantly, causing frustration during critical phases of a project. The limitation stems from the tool’s reliance on specific algorithms that may not adapt well to unique or intricate design demands.

• Best for: Generative design tasks
• Not ideal for: Customization-heavy projects
• Login required: Yes
• Free plan: testing-only — limited functionality for trial

Canva Magic Write

Canva Magic Write is effective for quick content generation, making it a popular choice among designers needing to create copy quickly. Its low setup friction allows for immediate use, which suits fast-paced projects. However, as projects grow in complexity or require specific branding, the tool’s effectiveness diminishes significantly.

Over time, reliance on Magic Write for larger projects can lead to inconsistencies in voice and style, as it lacks depth in understanding brand nuances. The structural limitation of the tool is its inability to handle intricate layouts or design needs that require more than just simple text generation.

• Best for: Quick content generation
• Not ideal for: Complex branding projects
• Login required: Yes
• Free plan: volume-capped — limited outputs

Figma Plugins

Figma Plugins enhance collaborative design efforts, allowing teams to integrate various functionalities seamlessly. The low setup friction helps teams adopt these plugins quickly, but they also risk breaking down when team members use different plugins or versions. This inconsistency can lead to miscommunication and project delays.

As the team scales or the complexity of projects increases, over-reliance on third-party tools can lead to issues with compatibility and maintenance. The limitation is rooted in the lack of control over third-party updates, which can disrupt workflows if not managed effectively.

• Best for: Collaborative design enhancements
• Not ideal for: Isolated design tasks
• Login required: Yes
• Free plan: testing-only — limited features

Runway ML

Runway ML is geared towards video and animation work, offering powerful tools for creative professionals. However, the setup can be high-friction due to its complex features and requirements. Users may face performance issues with large file sizes, leading to frustration during critical production phases.

The need for strong internet connectivity is a critical limitation, as many users find that their workflows can be interrupted by slow connections. This dependence on external conditions can significantly degrade the overall user experience, especially in remote work environments.

• Best for: Video and animation
• Not ideal for: Low-bandwidth situations
• Login required: Yes
• Free plan: testing-only — limited access

Designify

Designify provides convenient image enhancement options, making it suitable for quick edits and adjustments. Its low setup friction allows for immediate use, but users may encounter issues when seeking high-resolution outputs. The tool can degrade in quality when processing complex images, leading to unsatisfactory results.

As designers push the tool for more intricate enhancements, they may find that the results do not meet professional standards. This limitation stems from the underlying technology that prioritizes speed over detail, making it less effective for high-stakes projects.

• Best for: Image enhancement
• Not ideal for: High-resolution needs
• Login required: Yes
• Free plan: testing-only — basic features only

Artbreeder

Artbreeder is effective for aesthetic exploration, allowing designers to mix and match images easily. While the setup is moderately easy, users often face challenges when they need specific quality or style outputs. As projects demand more control, Artbreeder’s limitations become apparent.

The tool’s lack of output control can frustrate designers who require precise results. This limitation arises from its generative nature, which can result in unpredictable outcomes that do not align with project goals.

• Best for: Aesthetic exploration
• Not ideal for: Specific quality outputs
• Login required: Yes
• Free plan: testing-only — limited features

Hidden costs most reviews ignore

Many reviews overlook the hidden costs associated with AI tools, particularly in terms of time and maintenance. For instance, tools like Adobe Firefly may seem efficient but can lead to significant time investments when adapting to their updates. Users might spend hours troubleshooting or learning new features that disrupt their workflow.

Moreover, reliance on tools like Canva Magic Write can increase mental load, especially when juggling multiple projects. This cognitive burden can drain creativity and slow down productivity, making these tools less cost-effective in the long run.

When this tool stops being a good fit

Adobe Firefly, while useful for generative design, may become unsuitable as project complexity grows. Users needing extensive customization or high-quality results will find the tool lacking. Similarly, Figma Plugins might cease to serve their purpose when teams scale and diverse plugin versions lead to inconsistency.

As user needs evolve, transitioning to more specialized tools could become necessary to maintain quality and efficiency. Recognizing these shifts early can prevent workflow breakdowns and enhance overall project outcomes.

Who this is for / Who this is not for

This article is tailored for experienced freelancers and solopreneurs who are looking to integrate AI tools into their design workflows effectively. The focus is on those who already have a grasp of basic design principles and are seeking tools that can adapt to their evolving needs.

Conversely, beginners may find the discussed tools overwhelming due to their complexities and hidden challenges. Those who prefer manual methods or have specific workflow requirements that do not align with AI capabilities may also not find value in these tools.

FAQ

What are the key features to look for in AI design tools?

Key features include ease of integration with existing workflows, customization options, and the ability to handle complex tasks. Scalability and support for collaboration are also crucial for team environments.

How do I determine the right AI tool for my project?

Assess the specific needs of your project, including the complexity and scale. Choose a tool that aligns with these requirements while minimizing setup friction and maintenance costs.

What should I consider regarding tool scalability?

Consider how well the tool can adapt to increased workload and complexity. Tools that struggle with larger projects or high demands may become bottlenecks.

Are there tools better suited for collaborative work?

Yes, tools like Figma Plugins are designed for collaboration but may require careful management to avoid issues with compatibility and version control.

What are common pitfalls when using AI tools in design?

Common pitfalls include over-reliance on specific features, inadequate training on tool updates, and failing to recognize when a tool no longer meets evolving needs.

Final Recommendation

Choosing the right AI tools involves understanding when they become a burden rather than an asset. While Adobe Firefly and Canva Magic Write can be good starting points for generative design and quick content creation, they may not scale well for complex projects.

As workflows become more intricate, transitioning to specialized tools may become rational to maintain quality and efficiency. Regularly assess your toolset to ensure it aligns with your design needs and workflow dynamics.

See you around. We are Nexus. We Explore.